🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have scraped millions of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the apparent data breach could boost AI companies searching for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the leaked music would likely be used for developing AI models.

“Training on pirated material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “create their own private free version of the service”. The executive said it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.